How it all went wrong: Luke Jackson

August 24th, 2010 by John Krolik

sinbad-always-sunny

Welcome to “how it all went wrong,” a breezy romp through the ways the Cavaliers managed not to build a solid “core” around LeBron James during his time in Cleveland. This is an idea I came up with during the free agency process, but never really got around to it. Since I did, LeBron signed with Miami, who built their team this off-season in an audacious, unprecedented, and possibly pre-planned turn of events. Because of that, I realize that some people might say the Cavs’ failure to build a core around LeBron ultimately turned out to be a moot point, but I still think there’s value in taking a look how the Cavs were more or less forced to build with LeBron and duct tape during Cleveland’s competitive years.

One other thing: this is not a “this was all the front office’s fault” thing. Because LeBron made the Cavaliers so good so fast, they only had a few chances to make the move or draft pick that would have given him a true running mate or set of running mates. Due to a series of circumstances both within and beyond management’s control, the moves they made didn’t work out. Without further ado, the tale of Luke Jackson, the Cavs’ only lottery pick in the LeBron era.

The Theory:

Things were looking good for the Cavs after the 03-04 season. LeBron won rookie of the year and was well on his way to becoming a superstar, the Cavs finished the year strong after dropping Ricky Davis and Darius Miles, Carlos Boozer had shown promise as a potential running mate before his contract situation got more and more dire, and basketball was cool in Cleveland. All good things, and the Cavs had their sights set on building on the momentum they’d gained and making a playoff run.

With the #10 overall pick, Luke Jackson was the fairly obvious choice. Thanks to LeBron, high school/young player mania was in full effect, and the draft was full of risky picks: 8 of the first 20 picks were either in high school or too young to have attended a year of American college.
Furthermore, the Cavs knew who their star was, and didn’t see the need to take a risky player: they knew they were going to compete for a playoff spot next season and run the offense through James, so they wanted a player who would be able to contribute right away and would be a good fit next to LeBron. Again, Luke Jackson was the only thing approaching a “safe” pick at the #10 spot. Here were the players taken after Jackson:

#11: Andris Biedrins, a horrifyingly raw center (the Cavs still had Z) who was actually younger than any of the high schoolers in the draft

12: Robert Swift, a high school center and that year’s recipient of the Sonics’ scholarship fund for raw centers who didn’t know how to play basketball

13: Sebastian Telfair, who was considered a huge reach at 13 and most people were sure would be a bust (and who the Cavs would later GIVE AWAY. RIGHT AS THEY WERE BUILDING A RUNNING TEAM. A RUNNING TEAM FOR BASSY. I can’t talk about Bassy without ranting about my love for a short point guard who can’t shoot or finish inside. I apologize.)

14: Kris Humphries, who is Kris Humphries

15: Al Jefferson, high school big man

16: Kirk Snyder, who went to college and is now serving a three-year prison sentence. Currently working with Maurice Clarett on a book about how age limits keep players from making bad life decisions.

17. Josh Smith, high school player then considered a shooting guard, albeit one who couldn’t shoot or dribble with his right hand. Bilas predicted that he would be the bust of the draft.

18. J.R. Smith, high schooler, three-point gunner, neck-tattoo enthusiast

19. Dorell Wright, high-schooler

20. Jameer Nelson. I’m telling you, this was an ass-backwards draft. How ass-backwards?

21. Pavel Podkolzine “Pavel Podkolzine went one pick behind Jameer Nelson” ass-backwards.

Then Russian Teammates Viktor Khryapa and Sergei Monia were taken before Delonte West, Tony Allen, Kevin Martin, Sasha Vujacic, Beno Udrih, David Harrison, and Anderson Varejao were taken with consecutive selections. Making a bad pick in the 2005 draft was like making poor health choices in Mad Men times. I mean, look at the players taken before Jackson:

#1: Dwight Howard: Okay, he would’ve been nice.

#2: Emeka Okafor: I mean, kinda meh. Good player, but not a franchise savior. How much better would he have been at his contract number than Varejao at his, considering Varejao and LeBron’s chemistry?

#3: Ben Gordon: Would’ve been a nice pickup/player. No Scottie Pippen, to say the least.

#4: Shaun Livingston: (Shakes fist at absent God)

#5: Devin Harris: Would’ve been nice, but he was raw and seemed like a reach. Jury’s still out on whether he’s a star — very little talk about the power of a LeBron/Harris pair this summer.

#6: Josh Childress: Played LeBron’s position. Went to Greece.

#7: Luol Deng: Played LeBron’s position. LeBron was unexcited by the possibility of Deng being the fourth-best player on LeBron’s new team.

#8: Rafael Araujo: Probably a very nice man.

#9: Andre Iguodala: More on that later.

Furthermore, Luke Jackson really should have worked on paper. The dude averaged 21.2/7.2/4.5 in his last year at Oregon, on 48.8%/44%/86.2% shooting, had good size for his position, and wasn’t supposed to need athleticism because the Cavs had LeBron to create most of the plays anyways.

My basic “the team really screwed this pick up” rules are as follows: the correct choice has to be within five picks of the team’s actual choice, and not have been considered a huge risk or bad fit at the time — it has to be plausible that the team actually would have made the pick. No “Oh, the Grizzlies and Cavs passed on Amar’e for Drew Gooden and Dajuan Wagner.” Other than Jameer, there’s no player who wasn’t a huge unknown behind the Jackson pick, and Jameer went at 20. Here’s the scary part: if the Cavs had the #9 pick and a choice between a raw-as-hell, similar to LeBron, averaged 13 points in college Andre Iguodala, which player would have seemed like the more logical choice? That one would have looked terrible in hindsight, but even then the Jackson pick would be justifiable.

The Reality:

Unfortunately, Luke Jackson struggled with not being injured and not sucking throughout his NBA career. He played a total of 46 games for Cleveland, never averaging more than 8.9 minutes per game. After Cleveland got rid of him, he bounced from the Clippers to the Raptors to D-League and international ball. I saw him in Summer League this season, and he didn’t look like he belonged there. I don’t know if it was the injuries, but Luke Jackson never resembled an NBA role player.

The Cost:

Thanks to the Jiri Welsch debacle and the Cavs’ subsequent success, Jackson was the Cavs’ only lottery pick. No Durant/Westbrook/Harden for the Cavs, thank you. Just LeBron and Luke Jackson for Cleveland. Good hindsight is always fun, but for to fix this one you might have needed a DeLorian and a case of St. Joe’s DVDs. Sigh. Just because something was nobody’s fault doesn’t make it suck less in the end.

Notes and Errata: August 24th, 2010

August 23rd, 2010 by John Krolik

Just a few things tonight — I was in transit today, and now I’m back at school for my last semester and settling in a bit.

First off, here’s a fairly substantial piece I did for NBC on what LeBron’s game might look like next season in Miami.

Not many people know this about me, but I’ve actually been published in China. Here’s the story: SLAM China needed someone to grab quotes about LeBron from Phil Jackson and Kobe Bryant, and I was in LA and available, so I got the gig. They gave me two questions to ask, one of which was the following: “Which of these four terms would you say best describes LeBron James to you: A Man, The Man, My Man, or a Humble Human Being?”

Seemed a little silly at the time, but isn’t that the question just about everyone has been wrestling with w/r/t LeBron this off-season? Just kinda struck me as interesting. (I do suspect that there aren’t a lot of people who would choose the “Humble Human Being” option at this point in time.)

So J.R. Smith is available, apparently. Once upon a time, I wanted to see him on the Cavs, but I think his bad habits are embedded way too deep. Jacking threes whenever you feel like it when you’re as talented as JR isn’t the best way to go about things, but he’s convinced that that’s “his game,” and he’s been successful enough to get away with it, I suppose.

-Delonte with a 10-game suspension to start the season, assuming he gets picked up. Amazing how quick his stock fell, and I really hope he lands on his feet somewhere. I still think he’s worth taking a chance on, assuming the off-court stuff wasn’t too terrifying.

-Oh, let’s please get at least one documentary film crew to capture the Kwame/MJ reunion. Open thread question: Nobody really cared about reports that MJ repeatedly and viciously blasted Kwame with a certain anti-gay slur back in the early part of the milenium.

I feel like LeBron or Kobe would get in a LOT more trouble if reports of that nature surfaced about them now. Is it just that MJ will always be made of Teflon in the eyes of the public? Is it that our sensitivity to homophobic slurs has gone up in the last decade or so? Is it the integration of twitter/TMZ/Gawker-type stuff into the sports world? Or do people just not have sympathy for draft busts? Or am I just wrong here, and people/media types still think that homophobia in the sports world is just “boys being boys?”

That’s all I have for tonight. Until tomorrow, everyone.

Open Thread and goodness: August 20th, 2010

August 20th, 2010 by John Krolik

Oh, man. Not a lot to talk about tonight, eh? Sorry again about the lack of in-depth stuff here recently: again, I’ve only got a few days of summer vacation left before I likely never have one again, and that’s been taking priority recently.

-Re: Brett Favre and LeBron: I feel like there’s something to be said about sports fans’ obsession with narrative. The thing about sports is that they are not a story: they’re what happens when the best athletes in the world compete with a common goal in mind. The LeBron/Favre backlash does seem to speak for the sports-as-a-narrative thing, which is interesting in and of itself.

Part of me feels like all of this is sports fans playing the role of Sammi Sweetheart talking about how everything isn’t a fairy tale while Ronnie drunk (and possibly high on coke) is making out with multiple strippers and climbing up onto the stage. Some things aren’t supposed to be fairy tales. Embrace the strategy and the game, embrace the ridiculousness, and realize that it wasn’t all that long ago that Ron Artest and Kobe Bryant were the most reviled basketball players on the planet. The game is the game, man.

Honestly, that’s all I really have for tonight. Until later, guys.

Here are the new Cavs uniforms

August 18th, 2010 by John Krolik

If the above picture isn’t working for you, head over to the team’s official site for a look. I like ‘em — kind of an old-school flair to them, but clean and modern-looking as well. Hopefully this means the Cavs won’t be wearing 2,000 different jerseys over the course of next season.

The LeBron James GQ Profile

August 18th, 2010 by John Krolik

Is  here, in all its glory. Let me know what you think of it. Also, help me out with this question: is LeBron news still worth blogging about here? I don’t want to make “Cleveland hates LeBron” a through-line of this blog, but the LeBron situation and its fallout has, admittedly, been more interesting than the stuff the Cavs have been doing this off-season. I don’t mean to overshadow the franchise, I’m just telling you what’s going on. Let me know what I should or shouldn’t be doing w/r/t LeBron in the comments.

Notes and Errata: August 17th, 2010

August 17th, 2010 by John Krolik

Very, very, quick stuff tonight:

-Cavaliers set to unveil uniforms tomorrow/today. Apparently the block lettering will be new. So they’ve got going for them, anyways.

-Looks like the Carmelo and CP3 situations that could get quite ugly quite soon. After what Bron/Wade/Bosh pulled off, and the success of Boston’s Big Three, it does make some sense for superstars to feel entitled to a great team. ‘Melo to the Knicks almost makes too much sense to work, if that makes any sense. We’ll see how all this shakes out — I don’t think it was a coincidence all the free agency stuff this year happened during the last year of the current CBA.

-Looks like the Cavs have officially signed Samardo Samuels. Good stuff. That’s all for tonight. Until tomorrow.

The Cavaliers and turmoil

August 16th, 2010 by John Krolik

An ESPN.com survey that the entire basketball section of the website, including the THN, named the Cavaliers one of the three teams most likely to face “turmoil” this offseason. The Fearless Leader asked me to write about what kind of turmoil Cavs fans should expect from the team this year, and I obliged. Go forth and enjoy.

Weekend links and goodness

August 14th, 2010 by John Krolik

-Sorry for the inactivity, but there was not a lot of Cavs-related stuff going on this week. I swear I have some off-season type post all planned, but things can sneak up on you in the summertime — there’s 10 days left in my last official summer “vacation” ever. Kinda strange.

-Great to see all the HOF inductees tonight. Crazy to think about just how good that ‘92 team really was. And Pippen and Malone both deserved a night of their own — they were so good, so impossibly good, and yet they both played in MJ’s shadow for different reasons.

-On that note, here’s 18-year old Krolik on Scottie Pippen. I literally can’t bring myself to read it right now; I don’t want to know how much I sucked back then.

-According to the rumors section over at the fearless leader, the Nets are planning on snagging CP3 via trade or ‘Melo via free agency. With a lockout looming, does anyone else feel like ‘Melo’s free agency is going to be a very strange thing?

-Because it’s the weekend: Scott Pilgrim is really, really good. Amazing visually, keeps a great pace and tone, legitimately laugh-out-loud funny, and Pill/Kendrick/Winstead is a murder’s row of young actresses with serious chops. Also, great music, including the Metric song I embedded. Just an absolutely wonderful movie.

-Kelly Dwyer posted the following video and said the following thing when he guest-hosted TrueHoop back in the day, and I shall do the same now: Good Night, and Good Scottie Pippen.

On Chris Paul, other things

August 12th, 2010 by John Krolik

-Big, big ol’ four-team trade today. Here’s what interests me the most about it: the Hornets have, effectively, put all of their eggs into the CP3 basket. Collison may be a better player than Ariza straight-up, and is almost certainly a better overall package when you consider their contract situations.

But Ariza fits next to CP3, and will give him an effective wing option with some very good athleticism. (He’s also a spot-up shooter, although his ability to knock down open threes is more than a bit overrated.) As long as Chris Paul has the ball in his hands, Ariza a more effective option than Collison. (Although I will say that I was very interested to see what a Paullison backcourt would have been able to do.)

So here’s the question: did the Hornets make this move because Paul has given them reason to believe he won’t demand a trade/bolt after his contract is up, or did they make the move in an attempt to convince him to stay? And isn’t that the relevant question (that nobody has really been asking) with regards to Gilbert/LeBron? If you want to make things even more interesting on that front, consider that the Hornets now have Trevor Ariza, whom LeBron allegedly wouldn’t give an “I’m staying in Cleveland after 2010″ guarantee to last off-season.

If this is the Hornets trying to pressure/guilt the franchise into giving them a commitment, shouldn’t the fact that LRMR manages Paul and LeBron is CP3’s best friend give them some pause on that front? Although I don’t want to downplay the impact of the Hornets being able to get rid of the Posey contract, the main conclusion I take away from this move is that the Hornets will give up CP3 when someone pries him from their cold, dead hands. Seeing as to how CP3 is legitimately one of the five best players in basketball and I don’t see the Hornets being contenders in the next two seasons, this could end up becoming very ugly.

-I was interested by the reaction to LeBron’s “I’m making mental notes of all the people who took shots at me” tweet. Other than THERE IS NO GOOD REASON FOR LEBRON TO HAVE A TWITTER, my main takeaway from that is this: LeBron’s move to Miami to play with Wade and Bosh, along with LRMR’s involvement in everything, has definitely advanced the “LeBron wants to live Entourage, and doesn’t really care about true greatness” storyline.

Of course, the other side of LeBron’s move to Miami is that he’s now a villain to a large proportion of the fan population. We’ve seen Kobe’s Q rating go through the roof after he embraced a “borderline sociopath” persona — will that be the narrative that takes over if Miami wins it all next season?

The counterpoint, of course, would be that the MJ archetype is that he was a sociopath with his fellow players and a Man of The People to the fans — so far, LeBron’s appeared to be the opposite.

That’s about all I have for tonight. Until tomorrow, all.

Here’s the 2010-11 Cavaliers schedule

August 11th, 2010 by John Krolik

Enjoy it while you can: http://www.nba.com/cavaliers/schedule/